By understanding that these three phenomena always and only coexist, we should not be
surprised that as actions can be either adversary, neutral orsynergic. So too reactions and
resultants can have these same three possible effects.

Reactions can be adversary, neutral or synergic. Resultants can also be adversary, neutral
or synergic. And while this is not always the case, we would expect and discover that:

•adversary action usually provokes adversaryreaction ending in an adversary resultant
orloss, while

•neutralaction usually provokes neutralreaction ending in a neutralresultant or draw,
and

•synergicaction usually provokes synergicreaction ending in a synergic resultant or
gain.

Action implies a need for choice. The living system must choose which action or actions to
take. The living system must decide when to act and where to act. Actions bring choices.

Choice
Choice is defined in the dictionary as deciding, picking, selecting. This would seem a type
of pre-action, or for living systems mental or intellectual action.

The phenomena of choice begins even before the beginning of life. An Englishman, Thomas
Young in 1803, shed light on this phenomenon of choice when he designed unique double
slit light experiment, he demonstrated that the photons seem to make decisions.49A
photon of light makes randomchoices as where and when it will go in universe. When a
photon is released at a particular point in universe, one second later it can be anywhere
within a sphere of 186,000 miles.

If we were to define choice mathematically, we would say that choiceis the condition
where a system moves from a point of multifaceted potentiality to a point of single
actuality
. The photon, once released at some point in universe has the multifaceted
potential to be anywhere within a sphere of 186,000 miles within one second. We cannot
predict where it will be at the end of that second, for its choice is random. But we see that
it moves to only one place in that sphere. It selects a single actuality.

IMAGE Gift_Tensegrity02.jpg

49Gary Zukav, Dancing Wu Li Masters, William Morrow & Co., 1979

Appendix — Choice

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

92

CHOICE—def—> Multifaceted potentiality—becoming—>single actuality

If photons choose, then they may have a form of consciousness. This is not the complex
form of consciousness we see in humans. Light is the simplest form of process and
consciousness at the stage of light must be the simplest of consciousnesses.

Light is the simplest of universe's phenomena and humans appear to be the most complex.
In universe all is change. And change means change in energy. Change in energy is change
in information. Universe is full of change and universe is made up of energy and
information. We humans know that when we are confronted by change, we respond by
making choices. Every event — be it birth of a child or loss of a loved one, feast or famine,
poverty or prosperity, peace or war — represents change. Every idea — be it a discovery
that cures cancer or a decision to commit a crime — represents change. Every situation —
be it getting a new job or losing a job, marriage or divorce, childhood or old age —
represents change. We humans adapt to these changes by making choices. This is what all
living systems do from the time of conception until they perish. They make choices. They
make decisions.

The human brain is estimated to be capable of 10 raised to the exponential power of 800
thoughts (10 800) — multifaceted potential. The human brain will have only one thought
at the time of decision — single actuality. At any moment I am capable of an enormous
number of behaviors but I will choose only one — multifaceted potentialbecoming
single actuality. With the power of action comes opportunity for choice.

In summary then, Life can be examined from the point of Needs and Actions. All living
systems have needs and they meet those needs through actions.

The zone of survivability for a living system is called the biosphere. Biospheres differ for
different species and different classes of life.

There are three classes of life on earth — plants, animals, and we humans. The plants are the
independent class of life. They have no relationship with others. The animals are the
dependent class of life. They depend on others to survive. And we humans are
physiologically dependent, but psychologically and socially interdependent. Our animal
bodies require we eat the plants and animals to survive. Psychologically and socially, our
relationships with other humans are interdependent. Sometimes we depend on others and
sometimes they depend on us.

Appendix — Choice

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

93

All needs of living systems are met with actions. All actions require energy and have
duration and location. All actions effect or impact both environment and other. These
effects or impacts can be adversary — negative and harmful, or they can be neutral —
negligible, or they can be synergic — positive and beneficial. All actions are always and
only accompanied by reactions at the beginning of an action and a resultant at the ending
of the action. Reactions and resultants are also either adversary, neutral, or synergic.
Usually adversary actions provoke adversary reactions and end in adversary resultants.
Usually, neutral actions provoke neutral reactions, and end in neutral resultants. And
usually, synergic actions provoke synergic reactions and end in synergic resultants.

And finally, with action comes choice. Choice is deciding, picking or selecting an action to
take. Choice is a pre-action. Choice is multipotentiality becoming single actuality. Choice
made without knowledge is random. Choice made with knowledge is controlled. Life
makes controlled choices.

Appendix — Choice

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

94

Human Neutrality

Avoiding Loss

Today human life is not synergic. Most of humanity is ignorant of the natural law of
Synergy. Most humans ignore or hurt each other. Most humans ignore or hurt the
environment. This is the source of nearly all our current problems.

In the free world, we have created a system of human Neutrality as a mechanism to avoid
the loss of Adversity
.

Remember that the neutral relationshiporiginates in theplantworld. Sunlight provides
unlimited energyfor the plants. And so each individual plant needs onlythe sun, and
adequate water and minerals to survive. Plants are solar energy collectors. They use the
sun’s radiant energy in photosynthesis to manufacture glucose, carbohydrates and other
plant cells. Individual plants do not relate to each other. They relate only to the earth and
the sun.

No plant will deliberately hurt another plant, its success or failure depends solely on its
own efforts. Individual plants have no relationshipwith each other. Plants have no
awareness of each other, they ignore each other. To survive as a plant, you must be self-
sufficient
. Plants are the truly independent. They need no other life form to survive. Each
plant lives or dies on its own. If it sits luckily in the Sun with an abundance of solar
energy, it does not assist its brother in the shade. The motto of plants could be to live and
let live
.

The values of human Neutralityparallel the laws of plant neutrality. Free and
independent citizens relate to each other as equals. They are prohibited from hurting
another free and independent citizen, but that are not required to help another citizen.

Neutral government is committed to fairness for all its citizens. The government’s only
legitimate purpose is to insure economic independence and protect individual freedom.
To insure a safe and stable environment that allows the free market to work best. Today’s
free world is dominated by Neutrality in the form of neutral government, neutral nations,
neutral organizations, and neutral value systems.

Appendix — Human Neutrality

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

95

The unchallenged success of human Neutrality in the United States and within the rest of
the Free World has established that most modern values and beliefs are neutralones.
Modern humans are strongly convinced that they are self sufficient and independent, or at
least that they should be self sufficient and independent. They believe in their right to
own property and to freely and independently control their property. These beliefs are so
strong in our present culture, that it is almost impossible to imagine things any other way.

Trouble in paradise
But, is neutrality really the best way for humanity?

With careful analysis of the neutral relationship, we discover that the best one can get is
only equalvalue. The best resultof a neutral relationship is a draw. We are ignoredby
the experience. We are the same after the experience as before. At worst, the price is less
than fair, we get cheated. We lose. Or the product is not good, we get ripped off. We are
less after the experience than before. At best within a neutral exchange(1+1 )= 2, at worst
(1+1) < 2.

And while today’s beliefs in freedom and independence may be our most highly prized
values, many of our neutral values are not very humanitarian.

Whilehurting others is highly discouraged, helping others is rarely encouraged. We are
focused on products, and help is just another product. Generally, we ignore each other.
The free market is a neutral, anonymous and completely impersonal place.

You don’t know the person serving you at McDonalds. You don’t know their name and
they don’t know yours. There is nothing special about the relationship. You may eat your
lunch there every day for a year, but go in once without your wallet, and you won’t eat.
They will ignore you. If you don’t have the admission price. You don’t get in. In a world
where the highest value is independence, why should I help anyone. Everyone should be
independent and not require any help.
In the world of human Neutrality only products
and their fair prices really matter. If you can’t pay your way you don’t exist.

Despite all our pride in being free and independent, we humans are blind to the true
nature of our neutral relationships. Being truly independent means you are alone. You are
all by yourself. There is no one to help you if you get in trouble. The casualties of human
Neutrality are numerous. Because we are independent, because we are self sufficient, we
are encouraged to ignore the problems and difficulties of others.

Appendix — Human Neutrality

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

96

It’s always someone else’s job to help others not ours. If my coworker gets fired it’s not my
problem. If there are hungry children in my community, it’s not my problem. Neutral
humans are indifferent. Neutral humans ignore.

Today we have enormous and evergrowing levels of human poverty and suffering and
starvation effecting hundreds of millions of humans worldwide. Millions of children die
needlessly every year.

Today, homelessness is an institution found in every city and town in America. Large
numbers of humans live out their short lives completely ignored. Hundreds of children
disappear every day from the streets of our cities and towns — many without notice.
Neutral governments are indifferent. Neutral governments ignore.

Neutrality only works well when there are unlimited resources. Remember the plants have
an unlimited supply of sunlight. As solar collectors, they are the truly independent form
of life. Theirindependence requires unlimited resources.

We humans share the animal body of the space-binder. And good space is limited. This is
why Adversity dominated human life until the 17th century. As Hazel Henderson in
conversation with Fritjof Capra explained in 1988:

“Until the sixteenth century the notion of purely economic phenomena, isolated
from the fabric of life, did not exist. Nor was there a national system of markets.
That, too, is a relatively recent phenomena which originated in seventeenth
century England.

“Of course markets have existed since the Stone Age, but they were based on
barter, not cash, and so they were bound to be local. The motive of individual
gain from economic activities was generally absent. The very idea of profit, let
alone interest, was either inconceivable or banned.”50

Human Neutrality emerged in the old world with the creation of national markets, but it
was a partial Neutrality strongly dominated by the adversary systems still in place, and
constrained by limited resources.

IMAGE Gift_Tensegrity02.jpg

50Hazel Henderson, Quoted by Fritjof Capra, Uncommon Wisdom–Conversations with Remarkable
People
, Bantam New Age Books, New York, 1989

Appendix — Human Neutrality

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

97

For Neutrality to work,there must be unlimited resources. A more complete and purer
form of human Neutrality was institutionalized by the American Revolution that founded
the United States of America. The early colonists were in the right place at the right time.

The right place was the empty continent of North America. Millions of acres of arable land
and forests, filled with abundant water in millions of steams, rivers, and lakes and stocked
with uncountable numbers of wildlife. This was further enriched with enormous reserves
of iron, coal, copper, aluminum, zinc, lead, gold, silver, oil, and much more — all
available for the taking.

The right time was 1776, by then the collective power of humanity’s time-binding had
discovered, invented, and developed the tools and knowhow that created the mechanism
of the Agricultural, Industrial, and Transportational Revolutions. The level of knowledge
and technology available to the American colonists coupled with enormous North
American reserves, provided them with cheap food, cheap power, and cheap
transportation. Thus, conditions were perfectfor the success of human Neutrality.
America would have the equivalent of unlimited resources for the next 150 years.

The North American continent was nearly empty when human Neutrality began, today it is
getting full. We no longer have a limitless abundance of natural resources available for the
taking. Our world of plenty is being reduced to a world of scarcity.

In 1776, there were less than a billion humans on the planet, today we exceed 6 billion.

As things start to get scarce, the humans lose their option for Neutrality. Soon they have to
learn to do without. They go without owning their own homes. They go without higher
education for their children. They go without free time for recreation as they are forced to
get a second job. Or, they sidestep back into the adversary world — they steal, embezzle,
or defraud.

Today, within the United States, the very center of human Neutrality, we see declining
quality of life, declining compensation for all workers, deteriorating nuclear families, and
declining numbers of humans able to own their own homes. We see increasing mental
illness and child abuse; ever escalating health care costs, and more humans without access
to medical care. Examining today’s youth, we see declining numbers of college graduates,
mixed with increasing drug and alcohol use; increasing suicide; casual sexuality and
unwanted pregnancy.

Appendix — Human Neutrality

Gift Tensegrity

Draft Sun, Oct 28, 2001

TrustMark 2001 by Timothy Wilken

98