Too Big to Fail is Too Big!!!
Thursday, March 19th, 2009
David Korten writes: In a September 22, 2008 interview with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now!,
Senator Bernie Sanders famously said that if a bank “is too big to
fail, it probably is too big to exist.” That should be a watchword
slogan of any effort to fix the financial system. Major responsibility
for the financial collapse rests with the deregulation process that
allowed for the consolidation of banking power in the hands of Wall
Street. Reversing that process should be an immediate priority.
Before Wall Street there was Main Street
I
recall the time when banks were community institutions that were
limited by law to being single outlet community service organizations.
It was called unitary banking. Each bank was rooted in and expected to
serve the needs of its community. Deregulation unleashed a wave of
consolidation through mergers and acquisitions that shifted the focus
from serving Main Street to making as much money as possible for Wall
Street. To have a financial system that works, we must reverse the
deregulation process and restore the concept of community banking. Nothing less is going to solve the problem.
Wall Street holds government hostage
In a March 8, 2009 CBS Sixty Minutes interview with Sheila Blair,
head of the FDIC, it was noted that when one of the smaller banks
fails, it is taken over by the FDIC. The depositors are protected by
the FDIC. The owners, however, lose everything.
In
the interview with Blair, which comes toward the end of the segment
documenting the FDIC take over of a small failed bank, she notes that
the FDIC doesn’t have the jurisdiction to take over the large Wall
Street financial conglomerates that bear the major responsibility for
the financial collapse. As the moderator points out, the owners and
managers of the small banks are left with nothing. The big banks get
government bailouts.
Of the latter Blair says,
“Going forward, I think we need to really review the size of these
institutions and whether we should do something about that, frankly… I
think that may be something that Congress needs to think about… I think
taxpayers rightfully should ask that if an institution has become so
large that there is no alternative except for the taxpayers to provide
support, should we allow so many institutions to exceed that kind of
threshold?”
It is encouraging that this question
is being raised by a top government official in the financial sector as
it is exactly what Congress needs to address. Unfortunately, the FDIC
is not acting on the advice of its own head. Rather than breaking up
the bank it took over in Chicago and selling each of its five branches
individually to local investors to operate as local community banks,
the FDIC quickly sold the whole operation to a larger regional bank,
moving in exactly the opposite direction from that Blair is herself
suggesting. Of course moving toward greater consolidation under a
bigger established bank is a lot easier for the FDIC than selling
individual banks to individual investor groups that may have very
little banking experience. Moving to deconcentration and
decentralization takes serious effort. … (03/19/09)
more…




