Making Choices
Wednesday, December 29th, 2004
Timothy Wilken
writes: A human once said that the end justifies the means. And if
I intend good, then my use of evil means is forgiven. Another human
said the means become the ends. If I use evil means even in the
pursuit of good ends, I become evil. … Historian K. Santhanam wrote: “It was Mahatma Gandhi’s firm conviction that means are at
least as important as, and often even more important than, ends. It is,
of course, desirable that ends should be good and reasonable. But they
merely give a direction to life while the means adopted constitute life
itself. Therefore, if the means are right, that is, if they conform to
the tests of truth and non-violence, even mistakes, errors and failures
aid the growth of the individual. On the other hand, wrong means
corrupt the soul and no good can ever come out of them. Gandhi
repudiated categorically the idea that ends justify the means. This
implies the rejection of war, espionage and crooked diplomacy, even
when they are adopted for the so-called noble ends of defending the
country, religion or humanity.” … The
doctrine of karma was accepted by Buddha ~500 BC and is incorporated in
modern Buddhism today. It appeared in western thought ~300 BC, in the
Old Testament of the Bible as the phrase: “As ye sow, so shall ye reap.” … We humans have three choices. We can sow adversary actions and reap
adversary resultants. We can sow neutral actions and reap neutral
resultants. Or we can sow synergic actions and reap synergic
resultants. Adversary means will produce adversary ends.
Neutral means produce neutral ends. And, synergic means will produce
synergic ends. … Thus,
means always become ends. (12/29/04)
more…




