Genetically Modified Plants — SAFE?
Monday, November 29th, 2004
BBC Environment –
GM crops are no more harmful to the environment than conventional plant
varieties, a major UK study has found. The Bright project looked at
varieties of sugar beet and winter oil-seed rape which had been
engineered to make them tolerant of specific herbicides. The novel
crops were compared with non-GM cereals grown in rotation. The project
concluded that the GM varieties, used in this way, did not deplete the
soil of weed seeds needed by many birds and other wildlife. The
findings of the Botanical and Rotational Implications of Genetically
Modified Herbicide Tolerance (Bright) Link project were released on
Monday. Bright was designed to mimic normal agricultural
practice, and measure how these GM crops would perform when used in a
typical crop rotation pattern over four years. Not only did the project
find no evidence of seed depletion, it also pointed to potential
benefits for farmers of growing the GM crops. “What we have shown
is that in the case of these two crops, there are ways of managing them
which are quite practical, and farmers can deal with them quite
readily,” the study’s scientific co-ordinator Dr Jeremy Sweet told BBC
News. “There appear to be some management advantages in the flexibility
of the herbicide usage; there could well be cost-benefit advantages,
depending on the price of the herbicides and seeds when the crops are
commercialised. “So there do appear to be a number of reasons why
farmers might be quite interested in growing these crops.” (11/29/04)
more…



WARNING! – Reading this linked update can be hazardous to your happiness. … Richard Duncan Ph.D. is an Earth scientist studying the Fossil Fuel Depletion Crisis. He believes that the future of Industrialized Civilization is even shorter than he predicted in 2000. … I remember how startled and frightened I was when I first read Duncan’s papers. I spent many weeks of research trying to prove his theory wrong. I didn’t want it to be true. When I finally accepted the truth of his conclusions, I realized as a synergic scientist, there must be a synergic solution to this crisis. I started CommUnity of Minds with the hope of helping to focus on possible solutions for the fossil fuel depletion crisis. … There are three types of humans to be found in our present world. Which type you are depends on what you believe about how the world works. Adversaries believe there is not enough for everyone and only the physically strong will survive. They believe humans are coercively dependent on others, and they best understand the language of force. In this crisis, they will kill as many as they can to insure their survival. Neutralists believe there is enough for everyone, if only you work hard enough and take care of yourself. They believe humans are financial independent and should be self-sufficient unless they are too lazy or defective. They best understand the language of money. In this crisis, they will try to buy their way out. … And, finally a new type of human is emerging. Synergists believe there is enough for everyone, but only if we work together and act responsibly. They believe humans are interdependent and can only obtain sufficiency by working together as community. Synergists best understand the language of love. In this crisis, they will work together to insure mutual survival. Neutralists and Adversaries can learn to be synergists. We humans can change our minds. … Our survival will require that we wake up, and work together. The choice is ours, and we are free to choose. … If you want to work together, just let me know. –Timothy Wilken (11/27/04)




